|
There
are some scripts that read well. They have elements in them that
appeal to actors and directors. They get handed around and talked
about and attract talent like flies. Then the movie gets made and
we all buy our tickets, watch the flick and say, "Huh?"
It's not that the movies are bad, it's just that they never
quite click the way they should. Or the way that you thought they
would. Swordfish is one of these.
Skip Woods'
script tries to combine a standard espionage thriller with computer
hacking and although it occasionally comes close, ultimately the
cigar passes it by. Stanley Jobson (Hugh Jackman) is a convicted
hacker whose terms of parole require that he never touch a computer.
But his legendary skills attract the attention of mastermind Gabriel
Shear (John Travolta) who wants Stanley to access seven networks
simultaneously in order to steal billions of government dollars
stored in a bank. Gabriel sends the beautiful Ginger (Halle Berry)
to convince Stanley by playing on his attachment for his daughter
who lives with her drunk, drugged out mother and her porno film-producing
husband (these people are so outrageously worthless that it's funny).
Desperate to see his daughter again, Stanley reluctantly comes on
board.
As played by
Hugh Jackman, Stanley is the archetypal Hitchcock hero an
ordinary man who ends up involved in something way over his head.
Jackman isn't entirely convincing as a hacker, however. Let's face
it, if computer geeks looked like him we'd all be lining up for
Perl classes. But, hey, it's a movie and Jackman brings a much-needed
intelligence and vulnerbility to the testosterone drenched proceedings.
Speaking of
testosterone, John Travolta as Gabriel Shear revisits the menace
of his Broken Arrow loony with a character who is potentially
much more dangerous. And while his air of quiet threat is effective,
he is ultimately betrayed by the simple-minded script in which Gabriel
begins to take on the persona of Pepe LePew. Nothing slows him down,
he already knows everything and has a plan for it. So where's the
suspense?
Of course,
characterization is the least important element in a movie like
this. It's produced by Joel Silver, for heaven's sake, so it's about
explosions and lots of guy stuff. Of course, they try to Tarentino-ize
the proceedings by having Travolta deliver a monolog on realism
in the movies. The scene is effective (though it's a little distracting
to hear erudite film criticism coming out of the mouth of the guy
who brought us Battlefield Earth), and sets up the theme
for the movie. Well, it doesn't so much set it up as beat us over
the head with it. The monolog leads into a great action sequence
that takes us into an extended flashback.
The action
is all expertly choreographed and shot, but director Dominic Sena
runs into trouble when he has to handle scenes that don't have explosions.
The straight exposition and dialog stuff looks like TV, more specifically
it looks like an episode of 80s series, Miami Vice. And,
like so many before him, he stumbles at the challenge of making
someone typing on a keyboard cinematically interesting.
Of course,
part of the problem could be the script, which is simplistic and
juvenile to an almost laughable degree. It comes across like a 15-year
old's idea of a gritty thriller: the male characters are all tough
and smart-mouthed and the women are there to look pretty and service
them. The clever plan isn't really that clever, and some of the
complications are barely sketched in. For example, the FBI are there
to add another wrinkle to the plot, but Don Cheadle has too little
to do and never seems like any kind of threat to Travolta's plan.
Sam Sheppard plays a sinister Senator with his usual good ol' boy
threat, but he's ultimately dealt with in such an offhand manner
that you wonder why the great playwright didn't take the younger
writer aside to explain some of the basics of effective drama.
Swordfish
has many of the elements of the first Die Hard: a plan that
is much more complex than it first seems, a cool calculating villain,
and a hero who is out of his depth but realizes that he's the only
one who can do anything. Unfortunately, Travolta is no Alan Rickman
when it comes to oozing intelligent malice and the clever plot isn't.
The only person to come out of this with any merit is Hugh Jackman
who seems to be aiming for Mel Gibson's crown as an actor who can
handle the action, yet still create believable, flawed and interesting
characters.
My recommendation?
Video it.
|