|

|
|
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers |
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Okay,
lets get one thing clear: if you didn’t see the first movie, don’t
even think about shelling out for The Lord of the Rings: The
Two Towers. This is a film which has no truck with anyone who
isn’t up on “the story so far”. It just picks right up where it
left off and keeps on going…and going…and going.
Yes, The Two Towers is the movie that doesn’t end. After
the narrative drive and power of The Fellowship of the Rings,
this second installment quickly settles into a cinematic Sargasso
Sea, becalmed in the dull waters of a storyline that dissipates
into three separate and unequal threads, leaving the audience
emotionally distanced from the unfolding saga.
Of course, part of the reason for this is that Tolkien did not
write The Lord of the Rings as three books; he wrote it
as one, and it was only because his publisher balked at the length
that it was split into three. The result is that The Two Towers
does not even begin to stand alone, and can only work in the context
of the full trilogy.
As the movie begins, the fellowship of the first film has been
shattered, leaving Frodo (Elijah Wood) and Sam (Sean Astin) to
continue the trek towards Mordor in hopes of destroying the ring
forever in the fires of Mount Doom. Meanwhile, Aragorn (Viggo
Mortensen), Legolas (Orlando Bloom) and Gimli (John Rhys-Davies)
are in hot pursuit of the Uruk-hai, who captured the hobbits Merry
and Pippin at the end of episode one. That particular quest is
soon abandoned as Merry and Pippin escape into the woods by themselves.
Aragorn and his friends then travel to Rohan to aid its people
against the onslaught of Saruman’s (a magnificent Christopher
Lee) minions. The film then cuts back and forth between the three
threads of the story: Frodo and Sam with Gollum; Aragorn at Helm’s
Deep; Merry and Pippin with the Ents (giant tree creatures).
The result is that it is difficult to become involved in the
story, and you watch events unfold, marveling at the fact that,
while today’s special effects are in all other ways magnificent,
for some reason the talking trees still look almost exactly like
the ones in The Wizard of Oz. And pondering on such issues
as: if Gandalf is now a white wizard, why doesn’t he seem any
stronger? Why do all the Orcs have cockney accents? And, if the
rest of Théoden’s men manage to arrive at Helm’s Deep only
minutes after the women and children, why does it take Aragorn
so long (how far down the river did he float, fercryinoutloud)?
On the other hand, Frodo’s growing awareness that the ring is
changing and possessing him is gripping. His sympathy for the
Gollum, grounded in the knowledge that he, too, could end up like
that, has the sweat of true desperation about it, and Elijah Wood’s
wide eyes convey all the fear, sorrow and pain of one who carries
a very heavy burden indeed. As for Gollum (Andy Serkis), this
is the first time a CGI character has succeeded in suspending
belief so totally that he is easily accepted as real. The range
of emotions that play across his face as he runs through the various
schemes that might get him back his “precious” is more than most
real-life actors can manage after a lifetime of work.
Ian McKellen’s Gandalf returns, literally glowing in the dark,
but still with a mischievous spark that gives his interpretation
of the wizard a human dimension. Which is just as well, considering
that much of the film is mired down in the affairs of Rohan, a
kingdom of Middle Earth that is remarkably similar to the Renaissance
Fair on a bad day. It’s also similar to that view of the Middle
Ages familiar to anyone who has seen Monty Python and the Holy
Grail (i.e. Q: How do you know when someone’s a king? A: He
isn’t covered in shit). It’s extraordinary in a film which expends
so much effort and expense on recreating Tolkien’s vision, that
almost no effort at all was given to populating or costuming the
inhabitants of Rohan, who all dress in shades of black, never
wash or comb their hair and spend their lives in perpetual genuflection
to their useless king.
Equally, women are remarkable by their absence in this installment.
They are also remarkable for having almost exactly the same names.
Liv Tyler’s elf princess (as you will no doubt recall) is called
Arwen; the Rohan princess of this tale goes by the name of Eowyn.
Say them aloud. Their appearance, too, harks back to earlier adventures
with the dark mystery of Arwen/Rebecca serving as a contrast to
the blonde beauty of Eowyn/Rowena, with Aragorn in the role of
Middle Earth Ivanhoe.
As in Fellowship, the landscape of New Zealand plays a major
role (though we could have done with fewer swooping aerial shots
of snow-capped peaks), and the look of a Victorian illustrated
book is intact and effective. We are, however, treated to a bit
more of Tolkien’s Luddite tendencies (trees-good; machines-bad)
which are pounded out with such a heavy hand that you could be
forgiven for thinking the production was funded by Greenpeace.
Still, tree-hugging aside, the bulk of Two Towers is taken
up with battle. There are two relatively minor (but bloody) skirmishes
and then the epic struggle for Helm’s Deep, which takes up a full
half hour. But as complex as that struggle is, for emotional impact
it doesn’t come close to Frodo’s internal struggle. Yet the time
spent with the hobbits is minute compared to the endless, interminable
scenes featuring the besieged humans, all of whom take a full
two minutes to respond to any question. And with all due credit
to Pinter, great drama requires more than frequent pregnant pauses.
Of course,
the fact that all of this becomes an issue speaks to the fact
that The Two Towers simply isn’t engrossing, and that is
the core of the problem: it isn’t a stand-alone movie. For anyone
who hasn’t seen the first film, it is a mess of pseudo-Welsh names
and mythical nonsense (everyone and everything is the “something
of something else”) and that isn’t what it should be. This is
not a TV mini-series; it is a movie for which people will be forking
out actual cash, and it ought to stand on its own as a complete
work of art exclusive of the installments which precede and follow
it. And no amount of clever special effects can disguise that
fact.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
![]() |

| |
|
Keanu Contemplates 'Sinbad'
Wednesday, March 9, 2005
The latest in a long line of Sinbad the Sailor movies is set to star Keanu Reeves.
read more...
Diesel Gives Travolta a Drubbing
Monday, March 7, 2005
'Pacifier' soars to top spot, 'Be Cool' okay, but 'Constantine' lacks legs.
read more...
Wallace & Gromit Trailer Debuts
Tuesday, March 1, 2005
The first 'Wallace & Gromit' feature is about to hit screens.
read more...
Oscar: 'Baby' Bags The Big Ones
Monday, February 28, 2005
'Aviator' wins the most, but the Academy loves Eastwood.
read more...
'Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy' - Trailer
Wednesday, February 16, 2005
Finally! The long-awaited trailer to the even more long-awaited movie is here.
read more...
'Fantastic Four' Gets Out of 'War' Way
Tuesday, February 8, 2005
Fox blinks and moves Stan Lee's foursome out of Tom Cruise's path.
read more...
Superbowl 'Batman Begins' Spot
Monday, February 7, 2005
Not prepared to sit through endless hours of football just to see the 'Batman Begins' trailer?
read more...
'Boogeyman' Bags BO
Monday, February 7, 2005
Superbowl depresses weekend turnout, boosting horror and chick-flicks.
read more...
Oscar Bounce Boosts Box Office
Monday, January 31, 2005
Nominated pictures widen their release and reap the rewards, but horror is still number one.
read more...
Pitt Plans Oater Outing
Tuesday, January 25, 2005
Brad Pitt is set to play icon of the old west, Jesse James.
read more...
'Aviator' Flies High as 2005 Academy Award Noms Announced
Tuesday, January 25, 2005
Howard Hughes biopic gets 11 noms; 'Passion,' 'Kinsey' largely ignored
read more...
Blizzards Batter Box Office
Monday, January 24, 2005
'Are We There Yet?' wins on a weekend that's largely snowed-out.
read more...
View all news items
Subscribe to our mailing list, and receive the latest news items by e-mail.
News managed by NewsPro.
|
|
|
|
| |
|